From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,de5dfd6df880dd3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Vladimir Olensky" <vladimir_olensky@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Bugs or Mistakes?
Date: 1999/11/13
Message-ID: <s2q7ltj2hsq62@corp.supernews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 548058714
References: <19991112202656.2368.rocketmail@web216.mail.yahoo.com>
 <1999Nov12.201602.1@eisner>
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Date: 1999-11-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Larry Kilgallen wrote in message <1999Nov12.201602.1@eisner>...
>
>My experience has been that organizations with the guts to use
>the term "defect" have a better chance at good quality control.
>Your mileage may vary.


In industry where I have been working for many years
before my current work there were no such word
as "bug". There were such words as "design flaw",
"error" and "defect" and that resulted in very
strict and tight quality control methodology.

Word  "bug" implies something that lives independently
from it's creator and thus creator is not so much
responsible for what he did (or did not do to prevent this).

Regards,
Vladimir