From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e80a1497a689d8a5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Vladimir Olensky" Subject: Re: Ammo-zilla Date: 1999/11/01 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 543125368 References: <38120FAF.945ADD7D@hso.link.com><7uutgd$87h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <19991024.18033546@db3.max5.com><38189268.43EB150F@mail.earthlink.net><86ogdjtdwz.fsf@ppp-115-70.villette.club-internet.fr><7vadsp$8q61@news.cis.okstate.edu> <1999Oct28.221910.1@eisner><7vb3c4$8a21@news.cis.okstate.edu> <7vhg2n$7ht$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Date: 1999-11-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote in message ... >Robert Dewar writes: >I understand your concern, but I don't think it's all that bad -- I >don't think it's unreasonable to have Unchecked_Conversion of pointers >and garbage collection in the same language. You have to be careful, >and you have to minimize and isolate the low-level stuff. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ In a package that could be marked as UNSAFE ( Modula-3 approach to safety problem) or using "Pragma Unsafe". It would be nice to have such package marker as well as SAFE marker. SAFE marker is simpler to use than put a whole bunch of pragmas: pragma restrictions(AAA) pragma restrictions(BBB) ...... pragma restrictions(ZZZ) One can use that marker for completely safe packages. Otherwise UNSAFE marker could allow even more low-level unsafe operations. Regards, Vladimir Olensky