From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,24ac4e1c8cbfe3c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Vladimir Olensky" Subject: Re: histrionics Date: 1999/09/12 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 523890172 References: <37D670CE.855F96BD@interact.net.au> <37D678E4.9867000B@interact.net.au> <37d74de9@eeyore.callnetuk.com> <7r8c60$b2q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7r9rkj$g75$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7rb5lm$dhu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Date: 1999-09-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Bob Collins wrote in message ... >He showed that his method outdid the Rete algorithm (in the >lab). The AI journal he submitted the work to did not publish >his results (I think) because they did not understand LR >parsing and the PL journal he submitted was not interested in >the AI implications. This may be considered as an illustration to what I wrote in my other post: -- Along with technical reasons there are always psychological reasons such -- as people mentality, habits, influence of the environment etc. -- Very often human factor prevails over technical reasons. -- -- Moreover a lot of people are very reluctant to learn something new -- that are beyond their current experience and knowledge. Regards.