From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Brian Drummond <brian@shapes.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: what to do, for the mathematically-disabled people (only
 half-joking)
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:05:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <rt9vrf$aia$1@dont-email.me>
References: <d3bee653-7a11-4b46-8e59-77adc272b1ecn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:05:03 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1be6050112913260b18da381e9bb5df1";
	logging-data="10826"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19pNANEfWgXgl/1LIfMuQxLjufabz64Fpo="
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ggb5jU/by5eiw7zZED7+wcbWk44=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61065
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:46:06 -0800, Mehdi Saada wrote:

> What would you advise, for a mathematically impaired person such as
> myself, who gets a headache trying to implement a simple vector fusion
> algorithm ?
> And however I try, a few days, changes nothing to the outcome, shit
> doesn't get done, and I'm left furious at myself. And I know it well, at
> my age, when I, am the problem.
> Are those algorithm books useful, can they really hammer the logic
> muscles in my brain ?
> Basically, I cannot see in my head the (simple, I stress that out)
> program playing out.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mehdi

Sometimes, I find mocking it up in a spreadsheet helps!

Sounds dumb, but...

Say, I can think of a testcase and I know what the output should look 
like, start with a column of figures and more columns of (transformed by 
equation) figures, and ideally a column computing an error function.

Why is the error column 0 here, but not there? ... aaah...

For example I've designed pipelined versions of algorithms that way, 
before implementing in FPGA, and LUT-based quadratic interpolators to 
approximate reciprocal and square root, to get within 1 LSB error at 
single precision (multiplication/addition are cheap in FPGA, division/
sqrt not so much)

Also mocked up James Watt's link motion, a 5th order approximation to 
straight line using only rotary motion.

YMMV.

-- Brian