From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,84ebb57fe3fa097c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s01.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Larry Elmore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040812 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Help with getting GNAT Ada running on 64-bit Gentoo Linux References: <87smaeph5z.fsf@insalien.org> In-Reply-To: <87smaeph5z.fsf@insalien.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.1.185.48 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s01 1093305239 24.1.185.48 (Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:53:59 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:53:59 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:54:20 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2945 Date: 2004-08-23T23:54:20+00:00 List-Id: Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Larry Elmore writes: > >>Are there any pointers out there that provide any help with this >>process? I've seen 64-bit GNAT rpms for SuSe, but that doesn't seem >>to have much help for soeone using Gentoo. >> >>Thanks in advance for any advice or pointers. >> >>--Larry > > > This depends on what 64-bit platform you are targetting. I think your > best bet is to look at GCC 3.4.1; the GNAT in there supports several > 64-bit platforms. Oops, sorry -- amd64. I posted this a couple of weeks ago on the Gentoo amd64 forum, but no responses. The stumbling block for me is that you need a working Ada compiler to compile Ada support in gcc, but I can't get 32-bit GNAT working on 64-bit Gentoo so I can compile a 64-bit version. :-( --Larry