From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3f8aaabf09aa3a1a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 108abf,3f8aaabf09aa3a1a
X-Google-Attributes: gid108abf,public
From: "Tarver Engineering" <jtarver@tminet.com>
Subject: Re: CAATS
Date: 1999/08/28
Message-ID: <rsg0mehfj7120@corp.supernews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 518217623
References: <7q8mt7$81n$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,rec.aviation.military
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Date: 1999-08-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Joe Wisniewski wrote in message <7q8mt7$81n$1@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>(Slightly off charter for r.a.m. but couldn't find a closer aviation-
>related n.g.)
>
>What is the status of CAATS (Canadian Air Traffic Control system)
>being fielded by Raytheon out of Vancouver)? I know that this was
>supposed to be a very complex "Ada95 distributed objects"
>implementation. I know that there was a Tri-Ada presentation a
>couple of years ago relating to some aspects of the design/architecture.
>
>There seems to very little info out in the public
>domain on this project, or I am just not finding it?
>It is interesting because I would think that
>any "good news" from CAATS would have been used to offset some of
>the STARS "setbacks", if you want to call it that, over the last year.

CAATS was up and playing before changes to make STARS.  Maybe the people
that fixed CAATS to make STARS don't want to talk about it.

John