From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 2dsa | !2dsa ? Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 19:32:37 -0600 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 01:32:39 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="7389"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:60933 List-Id: "Rod Kay" wrote in message news:d3f3b7fb-e051-428b-a947-32310a64933en@googlegroups.com... > Hello all, > > I've heard that the Distributed Systems Annex (DSA) may be dropped from > the Ada standard soon. Can anyone confirm this ? Annex E remains in the proposed Ada 202x standard. Compiler support, of course, is up to vendors. Dunno if anyone is still supporting it. > I've been using the Polyorb implementation of DSA for some time and > find > it very useful. The way in which it abstracts away socket 'plumbing' > details makes > for very simple/understandable comms. That was the promise, not sure it ever really was realized. Since the Annex was weakened enough that third-party support isn't really possible anymore (necessary to allow it to be used with current middleware), it's really a vendor-specific thing these days. Randy.