From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c54bb73b6fd8d22
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: rracine@draper.com (Roger Racine)
Subject: Re: GDB Woes Continued: language related ?
Date: 1998/02/09
Message-ID: <rracine-0902980655220001@rjr1287.draper.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 323396591
Sender: nntp@news.draper.com (NNTP Master)
References: <98020309134734@psavax.pwfl.com> <dewar.886646918@merv>
 <01bd333c$4fb8b000$452c5c8b@aptiva>
Organization: Draper Laboratory
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <01bd333c$4fb8b000$452c5c8b@aptiva>, "Jerry van Dijk"
<jvandyk@ibm.net> wrote:

> What just occured to me is that contrary to Martin I use
> the Dutch language version of Win95.
> 
> Is anyone having trouble with gdb on a US Win95 ?

Yes, but I have what I am told is a rare version: Windows 3.1 => Windows
95 Upgrade that I bought in a store.  This version is supposedly fraught
with peril for gdb.