From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9a8c8a29d3e2d7c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!213.200.89.82.MISMATCH!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!easynet-monga!easynet.net!feed4.jnfs.ja.net!feed3.jnfs.ja.net!jnfs.ja.net!times.reader.netnews.ja.net!not-for-mail
From: Dr Steve Sangwine <sjs@essex.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Fortran Interface
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:46:12 +0100
Organization: Janet Usenet Reading Service.
Message-ID: <ror6h0dt950lbuq8ukerqhqkt9cdp63q2g@4ax.com>
References: <ce3tv5$ahh$1@hercules.btinternet.com>
 <ce4qvd$mnk$1@hercules.btinternet.com> <cegr3n$cd7$1@sparta.btinternet.com>
 <2n699dFta8mjU1@uni-berlin.de> <410e0ff0$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net>
 <2n6j29Fso58dU1@uni-berlin.de> <celdrb$dsv$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <410e4600_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> <celo42$p8j$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <61pug0lvubt8s0lj2dpd8vo37v9086qjkg@4ax.com>
 <Nu-dnTf-HfldPpLcRVn-tA@gbronline.com> <ceokno$n1p$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hyper4.essex.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: times.reader.netnews.ja.net 1091792774 21689 155.245.64.2 (6 Aug 2004
 11:46:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@times.reader.netnews.ja.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:46:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2608
Date: 2004-08-06T12:46:12+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:15:20 +0000 (UTC), Georg Bauhaus
<sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> wrote:

>Wes Groleau <groleau+news@freeshell.org> wrote:
>: Dan Nagle wrote:
>:> Has there been any thought, in Ada0Y, to improving
>:> the interface to Fortran?
>:> 
>:> Fortran 2003 in a long way from 77.
>: 
>: But is there any difference in what matters for _interfacing_ ?

What about double precision complex types. Interfaces.Fortran includes
only single precision complex, which is not much use when the default
these days is often double.

Steve Sangwine