From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx21.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64;
 rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Things that OO programming lacks
References: <DA%7w.753721$Y4.288171@fx24.iad>
 <d4b8f45d-e327-4d78-a0d6-838aba063e4d@googlegroups.com>
 <lyoascltws.fsf@pushface.org> <YYE8w.620042$Lj7.284655@fx22.iad>
 <87389olqie.fsf@ixod.org> <zTF8w.509165$No4.167804@fx19.iad>
 <fca06fd0-6970-46a5-95b9-6b6317a37f7c@googlegroups.com>
 <aSG8w.567817$Q61.266688@fx13.iad> <m40odq$tdv$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <DbU8w.703256$Fo3.563225@fx09.iad> <m439g4$bq9$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <m43c6o$1v1$1@dont-email.me> <10d9w.55626$8w1.22302@fx12.iad>
 <150er0b62wsh3$.1xabmp81w5kdw.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m44gfo$1kb$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1azsoc77wjhmi$.1grmnnlq033tz.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m44m2p$f9k$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5yzci4a8snfg.1dfsqjyvneeym$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m45757$huh$1@dont-email.me> <bezyvi09ddfl.1du5bw4wk652f$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m48aj3$i5u$1@dont-email.me> <yt48qnxs5uqv.xi5qk26z808b$.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <yt48qnxs5uqv.xi5qk26z808b$.dlg@40tude.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <rm6aw.762423$w82.743350@fx21.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 18:51:03 UTC
Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:51:03 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 1874
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2277582991
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23420
Date: 2014-11-16T11:51:03-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 16-Nov-14 03:18, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> There is no "our objects" in non-object-oriented paradigms.

Sure there is:
Ada 83 LRM 3.2, first sentence:
"An object is an entity that contains (has) a value of a given type."

It's widely acknowledged that Ada 83 is/was not object-oriented; 
therefore either the definition (LRM) is wrong, or your assertion is.