From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,99934eaa35a086e8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!newsmi-eu.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!newsserver.cilea.it!news.crs4.it!not-for-mail From: Jacob Sparre Andersen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Why should the value for a discriminant be static? Date: 09 Feb 2005 15:30:34 +0100 Organization: CRS4, Center for Adv. Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: jacob.crs4.it Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: pietro.crs4.it 1107958176 3491 156.148.71.80 (9 Feb 2005 14:09:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@nntpserver.crs4.it. NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Feb 2005 14:09:36 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8209 Date: 2005-02-09T14:09:36+00:00 List-Id: Occasionally I run into the limitation that the value for a discriminant be static. I can design my way around the limitation (when I remember it), but I would like to know the reason. (also because it might make it easier for me to remember the rule) Greetings, Jacob -- �You have to blow things up to get anything useful.� -- Archchancellor Ridcully