From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,beb6b378a857b7ea X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-20 07:21:53 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!btnet-peer1!btnet-peer0!btnet-peer!btnet!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!news5-gui.server.ntli.net!ntli.net!news2-win.server.ntlworld.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "martin.m.dowie" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <4948089f.0112180828.2ea4c80@posting.google.com> <4948089f.0112192354.5411f0ed@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: Use of entries using Ravenscar X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:14:04 -0000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.252.150.74 X-Complaints-To: abuse@ntlworld.com X-Trace: news2-win.server.ntlworld.com 1008861399 62.252.150.74 (Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:16:39 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:16:39 GMT Organization: ntlworld News Service Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18151 Date: 2001-12-20T15:14:04+00:00 List-Id: "Stephen Leake" wrote in message news:usna67xaf.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov... > jidu2851@student.uu.se (Jimmy Dub�n) writes: > > If I recall correctly, the Ravenscar profile forbids entries. Or maybe > that was only on tasks? Task entries are forbidden but not PO entries but you're only allowed one queued entry at a time... > In any case, this is complaining about the internals of the GNAT > runtime system; note the package name "System.Tasking". It could be > you have some object and/or .ali files hanging around from either "the > old compiler" or "compiling without Pragma (Ravenscar)". Try deleting > _everything_, and recompiling from scratch. The other thing I noticed was that nothing in the code actually required this unit to be withed in at all. (true of a couple of other with's and they certainly don't need to be withed in at the spec level - with things at as low a level as possible).