From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,119826e558c913d7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Pat Rogers" Subject: Re: Ada vs. C++ in defense projects Date: 2000/11/04 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 689808016 References: <8tv04t$n80$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a04bb7a@rsl2.rslnet.net> <3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 X-Complaints-To: abuse@swbell.net X-Trace: nnrp2.sbc.net 973398231 208.191.184.67 (Sat, 04 Nov 2000 22:23:51 CST) Organization: SBC Internet Services X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 22:23:51 CST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-11-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "E. Robert Tisdale" wrote in message news:3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net... > If you can find an Ada compiler which emits byte code for a JVM, > you may be able to convince them that they should implement > safety critical applications in Ada instead of Java. > Otherwise, you should probably just forget about Ada. I'm curious about something, based upon this and other posts by you. I know you've done some work in C++ and have submitted posts on the subject in other newsgroups. What is your professional experience with Ada? pat rogers progers@classwide.com