From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa944a2b10bdaa4a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!nerim.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: Laurent Pautet Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Distributed programming, a killer application for ADA ? Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:30:35 +0200 Organization: ENST, France Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dorine.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1086773435 12450 137.194.160.65 (9 Jun 2004 09:30:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:30:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YoTJ8vxY+4TS6HfxXFFwXBKpoT0= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1293 Date: 2004-06-09T11:30:35+02:00 List-Id: Wes Groleau writes: > I R T wrote: >> Perhaps demonstrating how to write concurrent distributed programs with Ada >> might help to create interst. > > Nobody but ACT supports the distributed annex > Apparently they think that CORBA is better. I am a little bit surprized by such a statement. -- -- Laurent