From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8623fab5750cd6aa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone.bc.net!sjc1.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 14:50:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 14:51:07 -0500 From: Wes Groleau Reply-To: groleau+news@freeshell.org Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Macintosh/20040208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Improving Ada's image - Was: 7E7 Flight Controls Electronics References: <40b9c99e$0$268$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk> <40ba315a$0$254$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk> <04udnR-eHNChzSbdRVn-vw@gbronline.com> <7J0xc.7371$8k4.269106@news20.bellglobal.com> <1086630278.542788@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <8xlxc.27603$sS2.845496@news20.bellglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <8xlxc.27603$sS2.845496@news20.bellglobal.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.9.86.14 X-Trace: sv3-6paPsSx0Q8duidc9N9Gvm97BW4WpLczWr4MWiGPq/c88jBeXhJeOxpow1N7B0N57dUtUpUmNibYucXs!2/a5SyxV4KPTLUOdqkcl69yG5ZiXIXxDiN8GapFYw/a632FlZnfK0BFlHwDNw4x5ydVa52bRH54m X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1248 Date: 2004-06-08T14:51:07-05:00 List-Id: Warren W. Gay VE3WWG wrote: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> By the way, to "beg the question" means to assume that which you >> are trying to prove, not to force a question to be asked. > > in your subsequent post, BTW). So I stand by the original > assertion that there are questions begging to be answered > in this kind of a statement before it can be accepted as > any level of proof. "begging the question" and "questions begging to be answered" are completely unrelated. Hyman, you are correcting a mistake that was never made. -- Wes Groleau Alive and Well http://freepages.religions.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau/