From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7eaf9f2597de2259
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-15 14:58:16 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
References: <mailman.1002721517.7620.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <9q25ec0248o@drn.newsguy.com>
 <slrn9sanqm.cb.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <9q421v0bbg@drn.newsguy.com> <slrn9sb4q1.hv.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
 <9q4a37$npd$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9q4e59018lm@drn.newsguy.com>
 <9q4lje$8201@news.cis.okstate.edu> <3bc6a8ad.1988649@news.demon.co.uk>
 <3BC721DA.BCBC4818@boeing.com> <3bca98d8.736428@news.demon.co.uk>
 <%DHy7.30147$ev2.37198@www.newsranger.com> <9qfi9q01ke@drn.newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word
Message-ID: <rZIy7.30273$ev2.37316@www.newsranger.com>
X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please
X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or
X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:57:43 EDT
Organization: http://www.newsranger.com
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 21:57:43 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14608
Date: 2001-10-15T21:57:43+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <9qfi9q01ke@drn.newsguy.com>, Robert*@ says...
>
>If you "think" of a package as an object, then what do you "think" of
>when you think about the tagged record inside the package?

You are veering the discussion off of the topic it was on. I was talking about
the generic-package OO technique. You (probably) wouldn't use a tagged record
with that technique. We were doing this in Ada 83 a decade before Ada 95 with
its tagged types existed.

---
T.E.D.    homepage   - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. 
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.