From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-09 14:10:18 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ From: Ted Dennison References: <8766bxx9mu.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 17:03:19 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 21:03:19 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11708 comp.lang.c++:81346 Date: 2001-08-09T21:03:19+00:00 List-Id: In article <8766bxx9mu.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer says... > >Ted Dennison writes: > >> Can it? In Ada at least, I understand that potentially dynamic-dispatching >> operations are really tough to inline. I suppose there could be something I >> don't know about C++ that gets rid of that issue. Is there? > >The standard C++ container library does not use dynamic dispatching >for containers, it even suggests not to subclass them. The container >library isn't very OOP. Perhaps, but that would give it the ability to be inlined. So there is a postive to that. --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com