From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f7344,dbab47e756f4068e X-Google-Attributes: gidf7344,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbab47e756f4068e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Rob Kirkbride Subject: Re: DEC Ada V3.3 Date: 1996/08/22 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 175738845 distribution: world x-nntp-posting-host: rk-comp.demon.co.uk references: <321C3BC6.1897@dial.eunet.ch> organization: Bedrock Corp. mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: Rob Kirkbride newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.os.vms Date: 1996-08-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: This is the sort of email that worries me. We have just upgraded to 3.3 in fact. We do have bits of code that interface with C and pass strings back and forth. On todays evidence, that stuff still seems to work. We have identified one problem that DEC have initially said was a feature. It concerns the use of Text_Io.Put, it does not seem to flush these until the program has finished running - even if a Text_Io.Get_Line is done! Has anyone else spotted this - how did you fix it? We get library corruption problems every couple of weeks generally when we have obsoleted some base types files several times. Anyone get similar results? In article <321C3BC6.1897@dial.eunet.ch>, Alan Paterson writes >Has anyone else experienced problems with the DEC-Ada compiler >when exporting and importing subprograms with STRING parameters? > >(We use these pragmas in order to construct and reference >shareable images on VMS) > >With Version 3.2 it worked perfectly. Now that we have installed >V3.3 we get nothing but access violation errors! > >We are currently trying to prove to Digital that an error is in >fact present (I'm sure that many of you will know that this is a >non-trivial task :-) but if anyone out there has had similar >experiences, perhaps we could get together? > -- Rob Kirkbride