From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-07 17:48:52 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!wn14feed!wn13feed!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc53.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc53 1055033303 12.234.13.56 (Sun, 08 Jun 2003 00:48:23 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 00:48:23 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 00:48:23 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38796 Date: 2003-06-08T00:48:23+00:00 List-Id: Let's make a small change: A and B are rotations, represented as matrices. Then A := A+B; sets A to the result of rotation A followed by rotation B. If "A+=B" was a legitimate alternative syntax for "Add(A,Increment=>B)", then it would in fact be implemented as a matrix multiplication, complete with intermediate temporary storage. Interpreting it as an element-by-element floating point addition would be quite wrong.