From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cb36983754f64da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-08 11:45:22 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!adsl-213-200-246-247.cybernet.CH!not-for-mail
From: Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler <nntp-2004-04@t-domaingrabbing.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping
   language)
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 20:43:54 +0200
Organization: JeLlyFish software
Message-ID: <r67b70tllcieh83kljnddtakuf23qa5i67@jellix.jlfencey.com>
References: <rxmbc.53$bh.32@lakeread02> <406EB6D2.8030801@noplace.com>
 <Xns94C049091E42Bjimmaureenrogers@204.127.36.1> <87d66pyw1g.fsf@insalien.org>
 <406EEC35.7040109@noplace.com> <874qs0zvy1.fsf@insalien.org>
 <40714C98.90601@noplace.com> <1073gv22t969q5a@corp.supernews.com>
 <40729B9D.30906@noplace.com> <1076000ef5oj06f@corp.supernews.com>
 <pan.2004.04.07.00.16.39.788210@email.ro> <uvfkbn0t9.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <0emdncWNfbOyUendRVn-gg@gbronline.com> <lVgdc.175$Kl.115@newsfe1-win>
NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-213-200-246-247.cybernet.ch (213.200.246.247)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1081449920 92284351 I 213.200.246.247 ([175126])
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6862
Date: 2004-04-08T20:43:54+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

chris wrote:

>Assuming it is true that an Ada programmer is 10 times more productive=20
>than a Java programmer, it can only be so assuming *equivalent* tools=20
>are available to do the job at hand and equivalent programming skill (no=
=20
>point in a comparison otherwise).

The tool is the language.


Vinzent.