From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Good/best way to enforce library-level instantiation a generic package
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:23:08 +0100
Date: 2020-03-18T10:23:08+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <r4sp9u$m59$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <r4rs1l$9bu$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
On 3/18/20 2:03 AM, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> wrote in message
> news:r4qbs8$192$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> type T is abstract tagged null record;
>> Name : constant String := Ada.Tags.Expanded_Name (T);
>> pragma Assert
>> (Ada.Strings.Fixed.Index (Name (Name'First .. Name'Last - 2), ".") = 0,
>> "Generic_Name must be instantiated at library level");
>
> That would reject an instance in a library-level child package, which
> probably isn't what the OP wants.
An instance IN a child pkg is not a library-level instance, so the OP would want
to reject it. But an instance AS a library-level child pkg would be rejected, so
this doesn't work.
AFAICT, a child pkg can only be a library-level pkg, so "library-level child
pkg" seems like overqualification.
--
Jeff Carter
"My mind is aglow with whirling, transient nodes of
thought, careening through a cosmic vapor of invention."
Blazing Saddles
85
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-18 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-16 18:51 Good/best way to enforce library-level instantiation a generic package Vincent Marciante
2020-03-17 1:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-03-17 10:11 ` Vincent Marciante
2020-03-17 11:21 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-03-18 1:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-03-18 9:23 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
2020-03-20 20:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-03-18 10:27 ` Vincent Marciante
2020-03-17 6:29 ` briot.emmanuel
2020-03-17 10:15 ` Vincent Marciante
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox