From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fe965693e0a17ca8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-29 16:11:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!sjc-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!iad-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT 3.14 NEW FEATURES LIST Current as of May 30th, 2001 Message-ID: References: <3B3CE920.ACCC7295@easystreet.com> Organization: LJK Software Date: 29 Jun 2001 19:11:01 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.44.122.34 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 993856264 216.44.122.34 (Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:11:04 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:11:04 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9271 Date: 2001-06-29T19:11:01-05:00 List-Id: In article , nickerson@mirage.boeing.com () writes: > (in regards 3.14 GNAT release notes current as of 30-May-2001 > which I applaud and hope to see more of): > > > In article <3B3CE920.ACCC7295@easystreet.com>, Al Christians says... > |> > |>I agree 100%. BTW, I didn't mean to be negative by asking a question. > |>There was plenty of good news in the list. > > questions and discussion about what we find in the release notes > is certainly NOT negative; if some of the ACT design decisions need > examining or rationale then so much the better; heck if it breaks > current code then even a bit of friendly whining is okay by me; Even if it _doesn't_ break current code, the discussion hopefully will reinforce with somebody somewhere the need to care about breaking existing software when making changes (not just in compilers).