From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c39ad3e35a7690a9
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr10011215pbv.0.1329146605393;
        Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni20446pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Convention for naming of packages
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:23:14 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <qx47vk57t9k$.153gsuuom74nx$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <op.v9fjran9ule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <jh1ef7$26qm$1@adenine.netfront.net>
 <4f355230$0$21451$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <jh4ev3$h3l$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <jh95ba$go0$1@dont-email.me> <op.v9k356ipule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <1sx3fy79wys5s.1723nejowbg76.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.v9l06jxiule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <15fgcngmgl41e$.113i7gtuwpwpv$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.v9l8ump4ule2fv@douda-yannick> <op.v9macrjaule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <c4yt2w9j0czc$.qsdtialfkbum$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.v9mej5bwule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <139v6qo34y3v9.1b9alw2z3gtqm.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.v9mhjc01ule2fv@douda-yannick>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-02-13T16:23:14+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:05:26 +0100, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote:

> Le Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:59:18 +0100, Dmitry A. Kazakov  
> <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> a �crit:
>> Ada 2012 has implicit dereference aspect which could potentially  
>> eliminate
>> stuff like Get_Value and Set_Value.
> Oh, I missed that. Which is the RM section concerned?

4.1.5.

P.S. I didn't evaluate it. It is difficult to say how useful aspects are.
The relation to polymorphism (dynamic, static, ad-hoc), is unclear. Only
dynamic polymorphism is really useful for programming en large.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de