From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,165d3eeae8b654b6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@ada.eu.org>
Subject: Re: constant record components in Ada
Date: 1997/06/27
Message-ID: <qw6lo3v99r8.fsf@esmeralda.enst.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 253018180
Sender: tardieu@esmeralda.enst.fr
References: <5p100i$pvn@sutton.cs.columbia.edu>
Mail-Copies-To: sam@ada.eu.org
To: Alexander V. Konstantinou <akonstan@sutton.cs.columbia.edu>
Organization: TELECOM Paris
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander V Konstantinou
>>>>> <akonstan@sutton.cs.columbia.edu> writes:

Alexander> Any ideas on how to tackle this ?

You can always make it a private record and define access functions
for both members and a modification function for the mutable member.

  Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@ada.eu.org