From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cd5fd99f6424012f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Samuel Tardieu Subject: Re: AppletMagic and the annexes Date: 1996/05/23 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 156267922 sender: tardieu@gargantua.enst.fr references: <4nsjoo$b8b@hacgate2.hac.com> <4nvv48$rof@foehn.enst.fr> to: pautet@email.enst.fr (Laurent Pautet) content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 organization: TELECOM Paris mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-05-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >>>>> "Laurent" == Laurent Pautet writes: Laurent> The rules concerning the use of sockets in Applets are very Laurent> restrictive. Implementing the distributed system annex in Laurent> such a context does not seem to be a trivial thing to me. Laurent> Laurent You could still use communication between the host from which the applet comes and your browser, using the distributed annex features more in a client/server mode. I don't know if AppletMagic is able to generate standalone Java applications. If it is, the distributed annex could be used in this case. Sam -- "La cervelle des petits enfants, ca doit avoir comme un petit gout de noisette" Charles Baudelaire