From: "Peter C. Chapin" <PChapin@vtc.vsc.edu>
Subject: Re: Verified compilers?
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:36:21 -0500
Date: 2012-02-24T12:36:21-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <qpOdnfHApYAIV9rS4p2dnAA@giganews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <078983c8-845c-41d3-99e1-08968e9a1a9a@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
On 2012-02-23 20:41, Shark8 wrote:
> I think the sentence shows a bit of solipsistic thinking on the part
> of the writer's view of languages; as everyone on this thread ought to
> know Ada's had verified compilers since its first implementations. (I
> am using 'verified' and 'certified' rather interchangeably here, if
> that's not the case though I'd like to hear what exactly the
> difference is.)
To me "verified" suggests formal proof. When I hear "verified compiler"
I assume we are talking about a compiler that has been proven
(mathematically) to implement the source language correctly. On the
other hand a "certified compiler" is one, to my mind, that has passed
some kind of official certification suite. The ideas are independent but
both are useful.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-21 15:42 Verified compilers? Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-24 1:41 ` Shark8
2012-02-24 8:52 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-02-24 17:36 ` Peter C. Chapin [this message]
2012-03-06 1:27 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-03-06 17:24 ` Shark8
2012-03-06 17:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-06 19:03 ` Shark8
2012-03-07 5:33 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-03-07 9:12 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-07 17:49 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-03-07 20:17 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-07 23:28 ` Usefulness of Formal Notions in Programming (was: Verified compilers?) Georg Bauhaus
2012-03-08 9:24 ` Usefulness of Formal Notions in Programming Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-08 10:30 ` Nasser M. Abbasi
2012-03-08 12:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-08 0:42 ` Verified compilers? Randy Brukardt
2012-03-08 9:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-08 18:10 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-03-08 20:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-08 18:02 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-03-08 20:40 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-09 0:44 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-03-09 22:13 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-03-10 10:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-10 20:35 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-03-11 9:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-11 22:22 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-03-12 5:12 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-03-12 9:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-14 8:36 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-03-14 9:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-03-14 11:14 ` REAL (was: Verified compilers?) stefan-lucks
2012-03-14 12:59 ` REAL Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-14 13:30 ` REAL Georg Bauhaus
2012-03-14 13:51 ` REAL Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-14 20:37 ` REAL Brian Drummond
2012-03-14 21:52 ` REAL Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-14 13:52 ` REAL georg bauhaus
2012-03-14 17:42 ` REAL Jeffrey Carter
2012-03-14 10:14 ` Verified compilers? Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-14 20:13 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-03-11 10:55 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-03-10 13:46 ` Brian Drummond
2012-03-07 1:00 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-03-07 12:42 ` Stuart
2012-03-08 1:06 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-03-08 9:04 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2012-03-08 9:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-08 11:23 ` Simon Wright
2012-03-08 12:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-03-08 10:23 ` Brian Drummond
2012-03-08 23:38 ` Bill Findlay
2012-03-09 13:56 ` Brian Drummond
2012-03-09 14:43 ` Shark8
2012-03-09 21:51 ` Brian Drummond
2012-03-09 15:49 ` Bill Findlay
2012-03-09 20:34 ` Brian Drummond
2012-03-09 19:40 ` Jeffrey Carter
2012-03-09 20:39 ` Brian Drummond
2012-03-09 23:59 ` phil.clayton
2012-03-08 15:23 ` Peter C. Chapin
2012-03-09 2:04 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox