From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED.fn3LatRFkm9/xzEj7F2/NQ.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Well spent time to start using gnatcoll.json ? Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:03:41 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <2c5b9e49-26fe-4e73-89a6-d53b910c7c67@googlegroups.com> <97326bf7-68c7-4686-a045-d340b53cc629@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: fn3LatRFkm9/xzEj7F2/NQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57302 Date: 2019-10-16T16:03:41+02:00 List-Id: On 2019-10-16 15:29, joakimds@kth.se wrote: > I do believe that the gnatcoll.json implementation is the standard way to do it, although it isn't the most performant. Maybe there is somebody else on comp.lang.ada that can recommend something else? Simple components has JSON parser as well: http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de/ada/components.htm#13.10 However, there is no reason to use JSON anywhere except than in some HTTP server dealing with JSON-encoded content. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de