From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Lundin?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Needed - Ada 2012 Compiler. Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 13:04:40 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <5c6d8e37-b737-4a8b-b601-0d0b4c10756b@googlegroups.com> <29e20858-6e53-4e52-a5e0-6ff7cb0d8f74@googlegroups.com> <1f5a3876-a27a-439a-bcf8-d24d96e437a4@googlegroups.com> <6b285165-962a-4bde-ae3a-87c72003a08f@googlegroups.com> <72cd2636-75dc-4aef-9636-0230c78e287c@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 11:04:41 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a5082088f91ae4c5830fa7aee1b49d58"; logging-data="8451"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19jyQJI8LWj43R/72faS4pJ" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:aviARJdqJS3lYAuXmEofyh7w2aA= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56409 Date: 2019-05-30T13:04:40+02:00 List-Id: On 2019-05-30 09:32, Simon Wright wrote: > I think we may be arguing about language differences here rather than > the actual effect of the GPL! I'm sure I'm as capable as the next person > of holding wrong opinions about the effect of the GPL, but I do want to > get the wording right. > Agreed. It started out as a compiler question, which then had remarks if it could be used commercially which the had some counter-remarks. And 1-2-3 the discussion turned into GPL discussions. Like most net discussions, it lost focus after a couple of turns -- Björn