From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Lundin?= <b.f.lundin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Needed - Ada 2012 Compiler.
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 22:47:06 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <qcmr4b$sni$1@dont-email.me>
References: <5c6d8e37-b737-4a8b-b601-0d0b4c10756b@googlegroups.com>
 <ff343399-8c00-467e-997c-0c6fb87f807a@googlegroups.com>
 <qcgpro$lmi$1@dont-email.me>
 <29e20858-6e53-4e52-a5e0-6ff7cb0d8f74@googlegroups.com>
 <f627b458-8155-43b1-8220-8524e801d389@googlegroups.com>
 <1f5a3876-a27a-439a-bcf8-d24d96e437a4@googlegroups.com>
 <d1ba037d-d355-45c9-a4f5-e51b65c0613e@googlegroups.com>
 <6b285165-962a-4bde-ae3a-87c72003a08f@googlegroups.com>
 <qcm854$1dq$1@dont-email.me>
 <72cd2636-75dc-4aef-9636-0230c78e287c@googlegroups.com>
 <qcmenm$7r0$1@dont-email.me> <lyblzlm4zc.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 20:47:07 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="1db3fe457fee2fc5aba78e3895be0025";
	logging-data="29426"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+2wOZ7bHQPGHy+BvyC6Wm"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u9SAw5dFNkkqfSb0YEZaCc2lzZA=
In-Reply-To: <lyblzlm4zc.fsf@pushface.org>
Content-Language: sv-FI
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56404
Date: 2019-05-29T22:47:06+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2019-05-29 21:32, Simon Wright wrote:
> Björn Lundin <b.f.lundin@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Yes, and I say that the OP's source code will get GPL'd when he link
>> and sell it with CE. _Not before_. So he can select to sell source
>> only, with _any_ license.
> 
> A bit misleading. OP's source code can have any licence they like, no
> matter what compilation suite they use during development. 

Yes.

> But if it is
> to form part of a commercial distribution including GPL'd code, OP's
> licence has to be compatible[1] with GPL and the distribution itself has
> to be made under the GPL.

Yes. If OP'd code uses GPLd code, then of course OP's code will be under
GPL. But he can still sell it commercially.

But if OP's code is not using GPLd code, then his/her code is not GPLd
until he/she releases binaries created with CE.


> [1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
> 


-- 
--
Björn