From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,83a56cb8370ebd04
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-08 12:16:23 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elnk-pas-nf1!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!attbi_s03.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: More details on:--- ADA vs JAVA sockets---
References: <btj4ha$pii$1@e3k.asi.ansaldo.it>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <qUiLb.782498$Tr4.2238587@attbi_s03>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.161.24.134
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s03 1073592982 67.161.24.134 (Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:16:22 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:16:22 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:16:22 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4223
Date: 2004-01-08T20:16:22+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>The possibility of loss due to UDP (I believe) is not the case ...
  An easy test would be to insert delays to artificially slow down the
transmitting side.