From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Anonymous Access and Accessibility Levels Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:03:20 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:03:20 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="13004"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56175 Date: 2019-04-22T17:03:20-05:00 List-Id: "J-P. Rosen" wrote in message news:q9ffjn$4kv$1@dont-email.me... > Le 20/04/2019 à 17:29, Jere a écrit : >> I was trying to get a bit better at understanding how accessibility >> levels work with respect to anonymous access types. I have GNAT to >> test out things, but I think I am running into various bugs, so I am >> not seeing the exceptions or compilation errors I would expect. It >> could also be that I misunderstand the rules (They are difficult >> somewhat). > In my tutorial about memory management, I explain that there are 34 > special cases in 3.10.2 (AKA "heart of darkness"). Enter at your own risk. That's all? ;-) I would have guessed in the 60s (although it may matter as to how you count). Randy.