From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Anonymous Access and Accessibility Levels Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 17:58:48 +0200 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 15:58:47 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="05cd135de431f144a472d698385dd702"; logging-data="4767"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zv2F2FCaWc0JqJXHIABt9" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:9Kgk4D/UIi29ZIzClAowrAmMQMY= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: fr Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56172 Date: 2019-04-20T17:58:48+02:00 List-Id: Le 20/04/2019 à 17:29, Jere a écrit : > I was trying to get a bit better at understanding how accessibility > levels work with respect to anonymous access types. I have GNAT to > test out things, but I think I am running into various bugs, so I am > not seeing the exceptions or compilation errors I would expect. It > could also be that I misunderstand the rules (They are difficult > somewhat). In my tutorial about memory management, I explain that there are 34 special cases in 3.10.2 (AKA "heart of darkness"). Enter at your own risk. -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr