From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED.fn3LatRFkm9/xzEj7F2/NQ.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Intervention needed? Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 16:54:02 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: fn3LatRFkm9/xzEj7F2/NQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56055 Date: 2019-04-03T16:54:02+02:00 List-Id: On 2019-04-03 16:31, Optikos wrote: > Which feature(s) [that other debuggers have] do you think are missing from GDB when debugging Ada? Other debuggers work, GDB does not. If you have an Ada project of a moderate size GDB stops working. > Which are the better-than-GDB debuggers for Ada that you have seen? Anything is better. VMS debugger was excellent. MS Visual Studio debugger is OK (ObjectAda used MS format, so that Ada could be debugged using the MS debugger). -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de