From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Question on speed of set operations Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:43:49 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 21:43:50 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="25411"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56040 Date: 2019-04-01T16:43:49-05:00 List-Id: "Simon Wright" wrote in message news:lyh8bl2s3u.fsf@pushface.org... > reinert writes: > >> So what is the best alternative among the following tree procedures >> for the above purpose (in terms of *speed*): > > If I were you I would do some benchmarking. Agreed. I doubt that there is a portable answer; it would depend on the internal implementation of the container type (which is purposely left to the implementation). Randy.