From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,54c513170bafd693 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mario@klebsch.de (Mario Klebsch) Subject: Re: Desirability of C++ Date: 2000/05/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 620746643 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <390D001C.7433140B@netwood.net> <20000507071636.16841.00001779@ng-fz1.aol.com> <8f4lso$1mn$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> X-Sender: 340014289748-0001@t-dialin.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.de X-Trace: news00.btx.dtag.de 957809110 18118 340014289748-0001 000508 18:05:10 Organization: T-Online Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Richard D Riehle writes: >"Even if Ada is better, it is easier for me to hire C++ programmers." He is >convinced that Ada cannot be so much better that it is worth the risk and >hassle of recruiting Ada programmers. He has his pick of graduates who already >know C++. Why should he bother looking around for Ada programmers? Perhaps someone should introduce ADA the his team of C++ programmers and let them decide. They probably are biased towards C++, but I am convinced, even C++ programmers can think and see the value of the language. 73, Mario -- Mario Klebsch mario@klebsch.de