From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1855e237a5aa1f02 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-rtr.nyroc.rr.com!news-out.nyroc.rr.com!twister.nyroc.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "REH" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1153142670.705239.270410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: 83 LRM X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:39:50 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.205.134.80 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1153183190 69.205.134.80 (Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:39:50 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:39:50 EDT Organization: Road Runner Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5747 Date: 2006-07-18T00:39:50+00:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" wrote in message news:KLKdnVLo8ZC9sSHZnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@megapath.net... > The only reason that there is a PDF of the Ada 95 version is that I made > one > to test the new tools at the start of the project that created the (2001) > Consolidated RM. It has a few formatting errors that have been discovered > more recently (one just a month ago), so even it can't be considered > "official". > > The PDF of the 2001 Consolidated RM is, OTOH, the same as what was printed > by Springer, and I expect the same will be true for the 2005 version when > that is finished up. (Keep in mind the version currently available is the > last draft, and it is possible that some changes will be made in the final > version. There definitely will be some changes in Annex P and the index > (not > normative, of course). > > That should be more information than you wanted to know... ;-) > > Randy. > > Thanks for the info Randy! REH