From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED.3jKGQbLNaoWoQIrQzaxioA.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail From: russ lyttle Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why couldn't an operating system be written in ada Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:04:27 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <4s8rud$9j3@tribune> <792fba1b-7a54-4d00-ae85-e6bd0737f001@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 3jKGQbLNaoWoQIrQzaxioA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55702 Date: 2019-02-27T12:04:27-05:00 List-Id: On 2/27/19 11:01 AM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 2019-02-27 15:06, russ lyttle wrote: > >> Thus my desire for an OS and Ada not dependent on any POSIX layer. >> Still digging, but it looks to me like gnat depends on a POSIX layer. >> Is that true? > > The GNAT RTS is capable to use pthreads if you mean that. Nothing more. > In fact if you look at the GNAT run-time you will see lots of > OS-specific calls. So, no GNAT RTS does not depend on POSIX. > I thought I was seeing POSIX Signals and Priority also.