From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada 202x and square brackets
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:56:54 +0100
Organization: Adalog
Message-ID: <q4p9km$v7i$1@dont-email.me>
References: <f0886b90-11b5-48b5-8a9e-da9ad33a2a65@googlegroups.com>
 <54a5873a-57aa-40c6-8af4-a6f908d53593@googlegroups.com>
 <b773bbfa-9fd0-431a-8ff3-462b2c5ccd15@googlegroups.com>
 <q4kov7$40n$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <be2e3cf3-e452-4501-a960-822bf6432cd9@googlegroups.com>
 <q4nfgq$r4r$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <e5f7df5a-4e83-4c1f-82ad-ee286627ffbc@googlegroups.com>
 <q4onqr$9rv$1@dont-email.me>
 <f6e597b0-e0d4-45ed-8233-258655508387@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:56:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="7843031666a1a589a8c4f01a55aea8ad";
	logging-data="31986"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18qw2UV1FHgFnFfxeIS6Xqq"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.5.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AGnKlEmQjuGKgNzIvOXpcsgS7rA=
In-Reply-To: <f6e597b0-e0d4-45ed-8233-258655508387@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: fr
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55633
Date: 2019-02-22T17:56:54+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le 22/02/2019 à 13:37, AdaMagica a écrit :
> Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2019 12:53:00 UTC+1 schrieb J-P. Rosen:
>> There are cases where you want to mix for clarity: ([1,2], [3,4])
> I do not see that this enhances clarity, but rather raises questions
> about the difference. I see new coding standards emerge saying: Use
> [] only for containers, not arrays. (I've seen lots of stupid rules
> in such coding standards.) So this would then be an array aggregate
> of container subaggregates.
A possible rule would be, when you have nested aggregates, to alternate
between parentheses and brackets. Or the rule you suggest. Or whatever
people find useful - i.e. better not put "good taste" rules, leave that
to tools.

-- 
J-P. Rosen
Adalog
2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX
Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00
http://www.adalog.fr