From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c89a4b067758a6e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ? References: <4a448c5c-a4ed-446f-bb8b-67c5ba99927a@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <47bbfb5b$1@news.post.ch> <21497899.Y65aT544dH@linux1.krischik.com> In-Reply-To: <21497899.Y65aT544dH@linux1.krischik.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s21 1203629462 12.201.97.213 (Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:31:02 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:31:02 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:31:02 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19952 Date: 2008-02-21T21:31:02+00:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik wrote: > > "Rot" and "Rouge" are not defined in the English language either but that > does not mean the colour at the lower end of the spectrum is not defined in > English. Actually it is - it's called "Red". Aklpt!s kizzl n!lpt da. The only language we're sure everyone on this newsgroup understands is Ada based on its description in the ARM. You can use any terms you like, but if they're not the Ada terms, expect to be misunderstood. Why exactly is it that you want your program to erase all your files? -- Jeff Carter "Beyond 100,000 lines of code you should probably be coding in Ada." P. J. Plauger 26