From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,997e6472f58cc955 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-03 19:38:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:38:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:39:15 -0500 From: Wesley Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Case dependence and coding standards References: <035odv8mfiksmqo69q0250qp141oebtdro@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.23 X-Trace: sv3-1XCB11TKj0zbipFeud5hYj2lMBpizmLwphrL6XvxiOFR61+K/o5Dv9Eb5qUptiiMorOGuAjefBtwCAe!QH4bL3TekDWoutLH35wpxFjD2ko8iANBuI/1j6akleg4iCKlZKavDL8tkNEBcIMLTH402JeH1o76!nTzd X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38567 Date: 2003-06-03T21:39:15-05:00 List-Id: > I *don't* allow pretty-printers and CM systems to modify my code; my > experience is that they make it worse as often as they make it better. Often true--not always. I use to call the one in Apex the "ugly-printer" but they've considerably improved it. > (The inability to turn off Rational's pretty printer in their editor is > a great frustration to me.) I don't even think it is possible to write a Yes, it can be turned off. And it's behavior can be modified by view switches and/or environment variables. > pretty printer that will do a good job in general; such programs can't > know when to line up declarations and when not to; when to leave Rational's pretty-printer as of 4.2 can vertically align all of: := in out => : -- (although it's still not perfect) In version 3.2, if you put two spaces at the end of a line, it would somewhat preserve your own alignment. If I remember right, Ada-ASSURED can do vertical alignment also. > comments alone and when to reformat them; and so on. (And I've tried to > write one; you'll find it in Janus/Ada.) I can't remember whether Ada-ASSURED can do this. Seems to me I've seen one somewhere that can do it.