From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8da181ade72859cf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!feeder2-1.proxad.net!news9-e.free.fr!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: timeouts References: <2jVUc.13319$Fg5.12445@attbi_s53> <%H0Wc.299737$%_6.62464@attbi_s01> From: Jean-Marc Bourguet Message-ID: Date: 26 Aug 2004 13:58:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Aug 2004 13:58:02 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.189.36.28 X-Trace: 1093521482 news9-e.free.fr 19231 62.189.36.28:31395 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3027 Date: 2004-08-26T13:58:02+02:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus writes: > Otherwise, do producers of compilers for "non-Ada" languages > manage to convey the impression that their compilers don't > have bugs? As a user of compilers for other languages: no. > I think that C++ compilers, or Eiffel compilers, or ..., are praised > to support almost all of the respective language and libraries. I can't write about Eiffel but C++ compilers tend to support different variants of subset of standard C++. And there is only one C++ compiler which claims support for the complete standard, which is dated 98. All others have no supported features. Yours, -- Jean-Marc