From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b7d18bb54ce3f52
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.180.75.8 with SMTP id y8mr1175913wiv.4.1344849010565;
        Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 n2ni107052813win.0!nntp.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news-feed.eu.lambdanet.net!news.bcc.de!newsfeeder.ewetel.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interface to aggregated type
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 21:43:22 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <pqmx0s03p9lk$.fbclercmsr1i.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <8e844311-f470-4382-8acc-ffe30aee1c18@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9A8bJrx4NhDLcSmbrb6AdA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-06T21:43:22+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:42:03 -0700 (PDT), ms wrote:

> Clearly `Request` aggregates `Header_Container`, as HTTP requests
> generally contain some set of headers.
> 
> My dilemma is - `Headers` package already provides some sort of
> `Header_Container` manipulation interface - procedures for inserting and
> deleting headers and functions to return them, but I want allow these
> operations also on container aggregated inside `Request` type (which is
> probably a private record).

If Request implements the interface of Header_Container and also aggregates
it, why don't you derive one from another?

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de