From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A function that cannot be called? Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 16:11:24 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <7ab688d0-b6b8-459c-b5b7-39b6c35daad2@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: IzvqdhUtDGKIMCldyDtZ+w.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:54672 Date: 2018-10-20T16:11:24+02:00 List-Id: On 2018-10-20 13:13, Simon Wright wrote: > "G.B." writes: > >> It might wet your appetite to recall that without the formal model >> of classical logic, none of Ada or its RM would be used by us. > > *whet > > Who is "us"? Certainly doesn't include me. Huh, RM does not look much illogical to me. P.S. I think Randy wrongly accused formal models. There was nothing formal in the "babble" that offended him, IMO, it was just a pseudo-scientific claptrap... -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de