"J-P. Rosen" wrote in message news:pqc1nf$5tb$1@gioia.aioe.org... > Le 18/10/2018 à 23:24, Randy Brukardt a écrit : >> After all, "good" is not a technical term, in any field that I'm aware >> of. > However, quoting A.4.9(12/2): > "The Hash functions should be good hash functions..." > > Admitedly, it's only implementation advice ;-) Exactly. One of the most meaningless statements in the RM. Note that this statement goes on to give a description of what it means: "...returning a wide spread of values for different string values. It should be unlikely for similar strings to return the same value." That's the important part; "good" really doesn't add anything here. Randy.