From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Least Dangerous Way to Do This ? Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:50:50 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <63bee5dc-51c0-4092-8e46-69e0301f1427@googlegroups.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 21:50:50 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="20347"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:54618 Date: 2018-10-17T16:50:50-05:00 List-Id: "Petter Fryklund" wrote in message news:63bee5dc-51c0-4092-8e46-69e0301f1427@googlegroups.com... ... >I don't think the U2200 is weird, it is or was actually a very nice >machine. Well, the actual machine code is very weird; it was weird enough that they provided our project with a guy whose main job was to figure out what was happening at the lowest level and feed it back to the rest of us working in the "normal" world. >Unfortunately most of the Unisys Linköping people where kicked out >before we could try Ada, but we where very interested in it then. I for a >while maintained the local releases of COBOL before going in to >performance analysis and cache-disk simulations. So far as I know, no one ever used the Ada 95 compiler we built for Unisys. (I hope not, 'cause we never got paid for one. :-) It was a lot harder project than we predicted and it didn't get done fast enough for the prospective customers. A very interesting project, though. >Is there any U2200 out there? comp.sys.unisys talks a lot about virtual >ones. Dunno. I haven't heard from any of that group in many years. Randy.