From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,32cfbb718858528b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-07 05:21:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Commercial C To Ada 95 compiler Date: 7 Jun 2002 07:21:01 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3D002D11.CC706952@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1023452463 20786 192.135.80.34 (7 Jun 2002 12:21:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25447 Date: 2002-06-07T07:21:01-06:00 List-Id: In article <3D002D11.CC706952@adaworks.com>, Richard Riehle writes: > Henrik Quintel wrote: > >> Dear all, >> does someone knows an ANSI C to Ada 95 compiler (commercial)? >> The compiler has to translate C header and C body files. > > This idea, if you will forgive my being blunt, makes absolutely > no sense at all. It might make sense in a mythical future when product liability laws discouraged vendors from selling C compilers :-)