From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Ada.Containers and concurrent modification exception.
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:32:02 -0500
Date: 2018-09-25T17:32:02-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <poed1c$jt3$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 95d94212-9ae3-423e-980f-705fea24744d@googlegroups.com
"Petter Fryklund" <petter.fryklund@atero.se> wrote in message
news:95d94212-9ae3-423e-980f-705fea24744d@googlegroups.com...
> Personally I prefer passive iterators:
Which has what to do with this discussion on tampering and dangling cursor
checks? A passive iterator still needs a tampering check.
Note that the Ada.Containers have these sort of iterators (in the form of
iterators with access-to-procedure parameters). And they have tampering
checks.
Randy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-25 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-19 13:12 Ada.Containers and concurrent modification exception rakusu_klein
2018-09-19 15:22 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2018-09-19 16:05 ` Simon Wright
2018-09-19 16:08 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2018-09-19 16:47 ` Simon Wright
2018-09-19 16:31 ` Anh Vo
2018-09-19 17:23 ` Anh Vo
2018-09-19 17:37 ` rakusu_klein
2018-09-19 18:05 ` Simon Wright
2018-09-19 15:53 ` Simon Wright
2018-09-19 18:24 ` rakusu_klein
2018-09-21 23:27 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-09-22 1:09 ` rakusu_klein
2018-09-22 8:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-09-22 17:49 ` rakusu_klein
2018-09-22 19:50 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-09-24 21:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-09-25 6:04 ` Petter Fryklund
2018-09-25 22:32 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2018-09-26 5:01 ` Petter Fryklund
2018-09-19 20:16 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2018-09-19 20:56 ` rakusu_klein
2018-09-21 23:21 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox