From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00006d3c4735d70
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-02 07:44:59 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!130.59.10.21.MISMATCH!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!newsfeed.nextoneserver.com!news.jgaa.com!news.hacking.dk!pnx.dk!munin.nbi.dk!not-for-mail
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: In-Out Parameters for functions
Date: 02 Mar 2004 16:42:05 +0100
Organization: Munin
Sender: sparre@sparre.crs4.it
Message-ID: <plfzcr2r3m.fsf@sparre.crs4.it>
References: <4020C947.81A6D703@0.0> <1075907239.138068@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <402232E9.3EE15B4B@0.0> <1075987360.225622@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <40236C0B.E988E003@0.0> <pan.2004.02.24.01.44.30.311621@email.ro>
 <1077634311.254581@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <pan.2004.02.24.23.23.33.578111@email.ro>
 <mailman.20.1077669870.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <pan.2004.02.25.09.01.17.858502@email.ro>
 <1077718871.47635@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <54cp3095jmv8s17h63d4bjdus0tec7l7pt@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <1077721343.481619@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <LIidnT3Ca4JDVaHdRVn-jw@comcast.com>
 <1077727853.904323@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <B8WdnRy5IL0WaqDdRVn-jA@comcast.com>
 <1077810250.28474@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <YLSdnQ0lYfaSTN3dRVn-iQ@comcast.com>
 <zld0c.8152$qX5.3749@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>
 <vLCdnZQsroNOb9zd4p2dnA@comcast.com> <1078162736.111267@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <fYudnfHKwtGXZ97d4p2dnA@comcast.com>
 <8qW0c.24142$TF2.22229@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <plbrnf4oss.fsf@sparre.crs4.it>
 <1078241064.575279@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sparre.crs4.it
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: munin.grove.home 1078242126 7140 156.148.70.170 (2 Mar 2004 15:42:06
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: sparre@munin.nbi.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:42:06 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6007
Date: 2004-03-02T16:42:05+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:

> > No.  You should know from the sequence the statements are written
> > in, which statements have been executed if it has an effect on
> > which of the _accessible_ objects are in which state.
> 
> I don't think so, given 11.6(6).

Right!

But if this really is a serious problem for you, you can handle it by
putting each of the five assignments in your sequence of statements
within its own begin-exception-end block.  Assuming that I have
understood 11.6(6) correctly by now.

Jacob
-- 
"Those who profess to favor freedom and yet depreciate
 agitation, are people who want crops without ploughing the
 ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning; they
 want the ocean without the roar of its waters."
                                        -- Frederick Douglas