From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9d5fc258548b22a X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!2a02:590:1:1::196.MISMATCH!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4d5008a5$0$6879$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <4d5031fe$0$6765$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1f229967-d3cf-42b6-8087-c97ee08652f3@i40g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <4d51169e$0$7657$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <1bnp0pw1c8r5b$.guxc48qweiwe.dlg@40tude.net> <1ju2bba947c1h.y05qev0wjx2t.dlg@40tude.net> <25z0jyvibze7.1pi559yfki5lo$.dlg@40tude.net> <611bc17f-753c-48bb-9c28-dc5e810085dc@q40g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <4d52c3c5$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <0be28ab4-84dc-4245-b6f7-264baaed776d@8g2000prt.googlegroups.com> <4d52cc67$0$19481$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:02:40 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Feb 2011 19:02:38 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 8500426f.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=TgRQ@BoD<3V1`E>oC;JXEZA9EHlD;3YcR4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:15:53 -0500, Hyman Rosen wrote: > Yes. If I'm going to believe someone who is claiming that > certain things are wrong and need to be improved, I want > to look at their work to see evidence that it is better > than that of the people they criticize. No, you cannot. There are economical reasons (ruined, non-functioning market of software), why it is impossible for anybody to design software properly. Even if they wanted. Those who couldn't sell their souls are out of business, long ago. There are some small niches remaining, rapidly closing. Something must happen, really disastrous (and it will), that would make the society and the law makers to rethink the ways. But so far everybody is happy except for a couple of retrogrades from c.l.a. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de