From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada lacks lighterweight-than-task parallelism
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:01:51 -0500
Organization: JSA Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <ph6a8f$vue$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
References: <e72534b1-17a7-40b5-92b9-01a4695e2743@googlegroups.com>
 <993f28de-6a64-480b-9c6e-d9714bcdef0d@googlegroups.com>
 <dbc90b0f-dc9b-4e5d-8009-7f02547055ca@googlegroups.com>
 <pgcuqh$7ij$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <167bec10-2a52-4c79-958d-91faadad915b@googlegroups.com>
 <pgdhag$1aa2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <2d6a5ab7-812f-47a9-a958-44177a3cf203@googlegroups.com>
 <pgdlc0$1hnt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <64a526cb-e6d5-44a6-b446-5b652ebe60ca@googlegroups.com>
 <pgdoip$1ntl$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 22:01:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk;
 posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226";
	logging-data="32718"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53457
Date: 2018-06-29T17:01:51-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message 
news:pgdoip$1ntl$1@gioia.aioe.org...
...
> How adding features like low-level parallelism makes compiler smaller?

Nothing low-level about parallel loops. They're in fact a higher-level 
construct than an Ada task, since they're checked (by default) for safety 
problems and any tasking used is implicit. "Parallel" is mainly a hint to 
the compiler that parallelism can be used (there's almost no case today 
where a compiler could automatically use parallel code, as there would be a 
substantial risk of that code being slower than sequential code would be).

                                         Randy.